His birth year varies on records from 1821 to 1841, but the family notes I found in the old trunk in the attic had his birth date as June 24, 1831, born in Ireland. In the 1860, 1870 and 1880 censuses his birth year figures to be about 1830 and his birth place is always Ireland. But by 1900 those stats start to change a little. On the 1897 marriage affidavit he gives his age as 56, born in Ireland. He was marrying a 51 year old woman, I can understand him not admitting to the age of 67. In the 1900 census his age is 64 not 69, born in New York. His death certificate has his age "85 yrs or there about" (81 by my math) and birth place Ireland, his son-in-law Levi Patterson provided the information. The grave stone has his birth year as 1821 which would make him 91 at his death. Incorrect information, plus the look of the grave stone, just makes me think that it was placed several years later.
Not being able to get a marriage record, I thought I would try for some birth records of their children. His son, Art, was born in Henry, Illinois in October of 1876. Birth certificates were not filed in Marshall County that early. So hoping to find a birth announcement (with no luck), I searched the Henry Republican newspaper and just happened to find this newsy paragraph from May 18, 1876. That last sentence makes me think John was a little annoyed. But this little clipping tells me that he owned land in Illinois, I'd like to find out more about that.
In this "Testimony of Claimant" form, John states he was born in New York, not Ireland as in the early census records. He established actual residence on that property in March, 1888 with "myself, wife & boy", that would be Rachel and Art. Question #9 is "What is the character of the land? Is it timber, mountainous, prairie, grazing or ordinary agricultural land? State its kind and quality, and for what purpose it is most valuable" The written answer is "Rolling farming & grazing land & very poor at that". Now I can tell from John's signature at the bottom of the page, that someone else wrote these answers. For some reason, I can just hear a grumpy old man telling whoever was writing it to "make sure you put that in there!" This is his signature.
With the story about the wolves, the remark about the land being very poor and the fact that he gave his children $1 in his will, I get the impression that John McGrath could gripe about it all right along with the Walter Matthau & Jack Lemmon characters from "Grumpy Old Men". Not as mean as the "warped, frustrated, old man" Henry F. Potter in "It's a Wonderful Life!", but a guy with a pessimistic attitude. That attitude may have made its genetic way down to me, my first reaction is most often negative. But give me a minute to think and I might see things better. John may not have had the best of luck in his life, but at least he didn't come over on the Titanic.